|
Post by Admin on Mar 27, 2020 17:42:43 GMT -7
|
|
|
Post by clarise on Mar 29, 2020 7:32:08 GMT -7
We don’t know very much,” says Matt Frieman, a coronavirus researcher at the University of Maryland in Baltimore. “I think there’s a very likely scenario where the virus comes through this year, and everyone gets some level of immunity to it, and if it comes back again we will be protected from it — either completely or, if you do get reinfected later, a year from now, then you have much less disease.” “That is the hope,” he adds. “But there is no way to know that.” www.opb.org/news/article/npr-do-you-get-immunity-after-recovering-from-a-case-of-coronavirus/
|
|
brody
New Member
Posts: 29
|
Post by brody on Apr 4, 2020 4:39:17 GMT -7
I stopped listening to experts and see what is at hand. "A wise man will believe what he see's and not what he thinks. A foolish man will believe what he thinks and not what he see's" Ole' proverb!
|
|
|
Post by clarise on Apr 9, 2020 12:53:20 GMT -7
I agree with considering what is real to be true, not predictions etc. However, i try to consider any research that is well founded to educate, not to indoctrinate.
|
|
|
Post by clarise on Apr 9, 2020 12:55:57 GMT -7
in the NPR article on testing positive then negative, i think the possibility that bad testing kits really makes it difficult to get real results unless constant testing of individual is done. Any thoughts? & how long or how many case studies are needed to make some progress on virus attribute studies - is there a normal procedure?
|
|